{"id":1436,"date":"2020-11-17T14:33:30","date_gmt":"2020-11-17T18:33:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/?p=1436"},"modified":"2020-12-12T14:35:17","modified_gmt":"2020-12-12T18:35:17","slug":"the-540000-camera-in-your-pocket","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/2020\/11\/the-540000-camera-in-your-pocket\/","title":{"rendered":"The $540,000 camera in your pocket"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Every couple years, we update our original 2014 blog post that asked the question, \u201cWhat would an iPhone have cost in 1991<\/a>?\u201d The purpose is to measure \u2014 at least in a rough way \u2014 the progress of technology by looking at the components and features integrated in smartphones owned by billions of people. In past years<\/a> we\u2019ve focused on the three most basic (and easily measurable) components: computation, digital storage, and communications bandwidth. This time, we will also look at another revolutionary facet of smartphones: their cameras. As luck would have it, the digital camera story also has a beginning in our arbitrarily chosen year. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In May 1991, Kodak unveiled the first digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera aimed at professional photographers. Called the DCS 100, it used the frame of a Nikon F3, but instead of film it contained a 1.3-megapixel Kodak image processor. It was the middle of the personal-computer revolution, and digital photography presented an array of at least theoretically attractive advantages over film and photo paper. Photographers would be able to capture, see, store, transmit, and manipulate digital photos \u2014 computer files composed of bits \u2014 far more quickly and easily.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

This future was promising, but Kodak\u2019s early system was still clunky. The quality was nowhere close to its legendary Kodachrome resolution and tone, and storing photos proved cumbersome. The camera came with a shoulder-carried digital storage unit which contained batteries, a visualizer, and a 200-megabyte hard disk drive that could store 156 images without compression. At $20,000 a piece (nearly $38,000 in today\u2019s prices), Kodak is said to have sold 987 units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The iPhone 12, unveiled last month, has three 12-megapixel cameras, which is 36 times the number of pixels of the original DCS 100. At $15,000 per megapixel, circa 1991, that\u2019s $540,000 worth of photographic power in every smartphone. Of course, this most basic measure doesn\u2019t begin to account for the radical improvements in image quality and a hundred other features that make today\u2019s smartphone cameras far superior in many ways to the very best cameras of the past. Lots of professionals like to show how their smartphones can match the best DSLRs, like in this road trip through Scotland<\/a>. Also, no shoulder harness needed. Right now, I\u2019ve got 61,300 photos on my iPhone backed up to the cloud automatically and retrievable instantly via 5G wireless. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The iPhone 12\u2019s new chip, the A14, also offers nearly 50 percent more computing power. But the biggest jump this year is the addition of true 5G wireless capabilities that will, conservatively, triple wireless broadband speeds and potentially boost them 10-fold over the next couple years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Building today\u2019s iPhone in 1991 would thus have cost at least $51 million, with $540,000 worth of cameras thrown in for free.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every couple years, we update our original 2014 blog post that asked the question, \u201cWhat would an iPhone have cost in 1991?\u201d The purpose is to measure \u2014 at least in a rough way \u2014 the progress of technology by looking at the components and features integrated in smartphones owned by billions of people. In past years we\u2019ve focused on the three … <\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tech-note","no-post-thumbnail"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1436"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1437,"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions\/1437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entropyeconomics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}