<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Entropy Economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entropyeconomics.com</link>
	<description>Global Innovation + Technology Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>China won&#8217;t repeat protectionist past in digital realm</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/04/china-wont-repeat-protectionist-past-in-digital-realm/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/04/china-wont-repeat-protectionist-past-in-digital-realm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccTLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
See our new CircleID commentary on the China-Google dustup and its implications for an open Internet:
China is nowhere near closing for business as it did five centuries ago. One doubts, however, that the Ming emperor knew he was dooming his people for the next couple hundred years, depriving them of the goods and ideas of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/04/china-wont-repeat-protectionist-past-in-digital-realm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Victory for the Free Web</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/04/a-victory-for-the-free-web/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/04/a-victory-for-the-free-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After yesterday&#8217;s federal court ruling against the FCC&#8217;s overreaching net neutrality regulations, which we have dedicated considerable time and effort combatting for the last seven years, Holman Jenkins says it well:
Hooray. We live in a nation of laws and elected leaders, not a nation of unelected leaders making up rules for the rest of us as they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/04/a-victory-for-the-free-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington liabilities vs. Internet assets</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/03/527/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/03/527/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See our RealClearMarkets commentary contrasting mounting Washington liabilities versus America&#8217;s key strategic assets. We also outline a new Internet paradigm for cloud-based video and software streaming that will create new digital content models, boost Web traffic, and require an ever more broadband Internet.
the graphics chip revolution will have a deep impact on the network. High-definition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/03/527/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collective vs. Creative: The Yin and Yang of Innovation</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/01/collective-vs-creative-the-yin-and-yang-of-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/01/collective-vs-creative-the-yin-and-yang-of-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Later this week the FCC will accept the first round of comments in its “Open Internet” rule making, commonly known as Net Neutrality. Never mind that the Internet is already open and it was never strictly neutral. Openness and neutrality are two appealing buzzwords that serve as the basis for potentially far reaching new regulation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2010/01/collective-vs-creative-the-yin-and-yang-of-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neutrality for thee, but not for me</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/10/neutrality-for-thee-but-not-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/10/neutrality-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Monday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, I address the once-again raging topic of &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; regulation of the Web. On September 21, new FCC chair Julius Genachowski proposed more formal neutrality regulations. Then on September 25, AT&#38;T accused Google of violating the very neutrality rules the search company has sought for others. The gist of the complaint was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/10/neutrality-for-thee-but-not-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leviathan Spam</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/leviathan-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/leviathan-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bret Swanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exaflood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Leviathan Spam
Send the bits with lasers and chips
See the bytes with LED lights
Wireless, optical, bandwidth boom
A flood of info, a global zoom
Now comes Lessig
Now comes Wu
To tell us what we cannot do
The Net, they say,
Is under attack
Stop!
Before we can’t turn back
They know best
These coder kings
So they prohibit a billion things
What is on their list of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/leviathan-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Leash on the Net?</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/a-new-leash-on-the-net/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/a-new-leash-on-the-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bret Swanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exaflood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, FCC chairman Julius Genachowski proposed new regulations on communications networks. We were among the very first opponents of these so-called &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; rules when they were first proposed in concept back in 2004. Here are a number of our relevant articles over the past few years:

&#8220;Let There Be Bandwidth&#8221; – The Wall Street Journal, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/a-new-leash-on-the-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Noise On the Net</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/political-noise-on-the-net/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/political-noise-on-the-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With an agreement between the U.S. Department of Commerce and ICANN (the nonprofit Internet Corp. for Assigned Names and Numbers, headquartered in California) expiring on September 30, global bureaucrats salivate. As I write today in Forbes, they like to criticize ICANN leadership &#8212; hoping to gain political control &#8212; but too often ignore the huge [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/09/political-noise-on-the-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Yin and Yang</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two key mistakes in the public policy arena that we don’t talk enough about. They are two apparently opposite sides of the same fallacious coin.
Call the first fallacy “innovation blindness.” In this case, policy makers can’t see the way new technologies or ideas might affect, say, the future cost of health care, or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/08/innovation-yin-and-yang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romer&#8217;s transformative &#8220;Charter Cities&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/08/romers-transformative-charter-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/08/romers-transformative-charter-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropyeconomics.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanford economist Paul Romer has had lots of good ideas over the years. Particularly his ideas about the importance of ideas in the economy. But his &#8220;Charter City&#8221; idea explored at the recent TED conference is one of the best yet.
Maybe I like it so much because it so closely tracks the concepts offered in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://entropyeconomics.com/index.php/2009/08/romers-transformative-charter-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
